Studio-grade charts are usually gated behind a specialist you brief, wait on, and pay by the day — which is why most companies never get one. This does the same job in minutes, for the price of a lunch, and hands you the editable file at the end.
Every card links to a live chart built to exactly the standard yours would be. Open one and inspect it — hover it, switch its theme, export it.
A quarterly deck usually argues in tables. Replace three of them with a chart that shows level and movement in one frame, and the discussion changes. Drop in the PDF or paste the PNG.
A 1080×1350 portrait poster is the shape that fills a mobile feed. Take the PNG as it is, or take the SVG into Illustrator or Figma and restyle it without touching the geometry.
Copy an iframe snippet into your site, blog or docs. Hover, tooltips, theme switching and export all come with it — sandboxed, and it works offline in the HTML you keep.
Every headline figure is computed from your file at render time, never typed, and the source and caveats sit in the footer. When someone checks your chart, it holds.
Ten years of data and no story is the usual problem. Indexing, ranking and distribution views turn a table into an argument — and the same chart exports for print, screen and social.
Correct, attributed, on deadline, in light, dark or mono print themes. If the data cannot support the headline you wanted, you will be told before it ships, not after.
Charts at this level have always been available. They have just never been available to most companies.
A data-visualization specialist is a scarce, senior hire, and an agency engagement is scoped in weeks. Both are priced for organisations that publish charts constantly. If you need six good charts a year, neither maths works — so you make do with the default output of a spreadsheet.
Three chart proposals on your real data, free. A production-grade interactive chart in minutes. Credit packs start at €19 for a single chart, and the Pro pack is white-label — your charts carry no AK.VIZ credit. Same standard either way.
This is the whole point: a small team should not have to choose between a chart that looks like a spreadsheet and a budget it does not have.
The same chart, exported five ways — so a single build serves the deck, the feed, the site and the print run.
Portrait 4:5, the shape that fills a mobile feed. Rendered at 2× from the same vector poster, so it is crisp at any size.
Drops straight into slides or a board pack, at the resolution print needs.
The full chart with hover and animation. Yours to keep, hosted anywhere, works offline.
Copy-paste into a blog, article or dashboard. Sandboxed, so it cannot reach the page around it.
Real vectors, not a screenshot. Open it in Illustrator or Figma and restyle every element — the geometry is already correct.
Cinematic dark, vivid, editorial light and mono print. Every one checked for contrast, so nothing goes pale-grey-on-white.
The bottleneck in a campaign graphic is almost never the styling. It is getting the geometry right in the first place.
A designer can make anything look good. What costs a week is the underlying construction — the projection that does not distort area, the treemap where every cell really is its value, the axis that does not flatten the story. That arrives already solved, as clean vector paths.
Open the SVG, drop in your palette and type, add the annotations your campaign needs. You are starting from a correct chart rather than from a blank artboard — which is the difference between an afternoon and a fortnight.
The result is the standard people mean when they say “like Visual Capitalist” — reachable by a two-person marketing team, on a normal budget, this week.
Anything can generate a chart. The difference is what happens when the data will not support the chart you asked for.
Before delivery: overlapping labels, contrast against the actual background in every theme, type below the legible floor, the export canvas, and how much of the poster the graphic actually gets. A chart that fails does not ship.
Headline figures, totals, shares and rankings are derived at render time. A typed number goes stale the moment the data is refreshed; a computed one cannot.
If a series has a break in it, if coverage has quietly decayed, if the comparison you want is not a fair one — that is raised before anything is drawn, with the alternative alongside it.
Two worked examples, written up in full: a statistical break that would have printed a 24% fall that never happened, and a solver setting that drew the smallest cells 246% too large. Both were caught before publication. That is the part you are actually buying.
Three chart proposals on your own numbers, free, no card needed.